Indicator: scale from 2 - 20
To provide a starting point and pathway to safer foodware and packaging, a matrix approach was developed that considers (1) the presence of chemicals of concern in the packaging material, and (2) the migration potential of chemicals in the food being packaged. These scores are then combined to calculate (3) an overall CoC score.
Presence Score
To evaluate the human health impact of a foodware or packaging article, the first aspect to address is whether there are any intentionally added and potentially harmful chemicals in a product. The UP Scorecard does this by asking users to check for these chemicals and then to disclose the reliability of this claim.
Compliance with the FCCprio List
Compliance with the FCCprio List's tiers of priority chemicals can help suppliers and purchasers stay ahead of future regulations and consumer concerns. If a product does not intentionally contain any of the 1,200+ chemicals listed in the 4 tiers, it can get the highest score. If at least one chemical from tier 1 is intentionally present, the product gets the worst score. The score can be progressively improved by manually confirming that chemicals from tiers 1, 2, 3, and 4 are not intentionally used in the product.
Applying a Disclosure Level
The scorecard also rewards the disclosure level used to declare compliance with the FCCprio List. Users can declare different levels of disclosure that a product does not intentionally contain any of the chemicals in one or more of the tiers:
Migration Potential Score
Beyond just containing a chemical of concern, another important aspect is the likelihood of the chemical migrating into the food (and exposing the consumer). This is directly linked to the inertness of the food contact material (material inertness) and to the conditions in which the food contact article is used (defining food and material interactions).
Material Inertness
Beyond just describing the migration of intentionally used CoCs, considering the material inertness also helps to take into account the potential migration of many additional chemicals that can be present known as non-intentionally added substances (NIAS). These are often entirely unknown and untested chemicals present in a material as contaminants, degradation products, or reaction by-products from the production process. They too can have hazardous properties and threaten consumer health.
Food and Material Interaction
There is scientific evidence showing that the release of chemicals from foodware and packaging into foodstuffs is influenced by various factors characterizing the storage and usage conditions.
Such factors include storage time, temperature, fat content, acidity, as well as container size.
In the UP Scorecard, an example worst-case scenario with the highest food and material interactions (leading to the most chemical migration) would be a hot, oily, acidic soup served in a small cup. A pre-defined set of common foods is available in the scorecard for users to apply. Users can also create and save custom foods to use in their product comparisons by providing some basic information about the food's properties and storage conditions.
Overall Chemicals of Concern Score
The overall CoC score combines the Presence Score and the Migration Potential Score as shown in Equation 1. This score is then linearly normalized to be within the range of 1 (worst) to 100 (best) so as to match the scoring range of the other five metrics.
Example Scores
The graphic below shows the default CoC score for a highly inert material (ceramic) and a less inert material (PP). The graphic also shows the influence of the foodstuff being packaged on the CoC score. In both cases, the default compliance score is assumed (meaning that CoCs may be intentionally used in both products). A user could manually improve the scores by confirming compliance with the FCCprio List based on a high disclosure level.