LogoLogo
HomepageUP Scorecard tool
  • Background information
    • 🆙What is the UP Scorecard?
    • 🌲Health impacts of foodware and packaging: why does it matter?
    • đŸĨ¤What is sustainable food packaging?
    • â„šī¸Food Contact Materials (FCMs)
      • đŸŦPlastics
      • đŸŒŊBioplastics
      • đŸĢ™Glass
      • đŸĨĢMetal
      • 🍟Paper & board
      • 🧃Multimaterial
      • ☕Ceramic
    • đŸŽ›ī¸Packaging systems
      • 🔂Single-use packaging
      • 🔁Reusable packaging
  • METHODOLOGY
    • âš™ī¸UP Scorecard methodology
    • 📊The six UP Scorecard metrics
      • â˜ī¸Climate Impact
      • 🚰Water Use
      • đŸ—‘ī¸Plastic Pollution
      • đŸŒŗSustainable Sourcing
      • 🔄Recoverability
      • âš—ī¸Chemicals of Concern
    • đŸ’ģData sources
  • Using the tool
    • 👤Creating an account
    • 🔀Choose your mode
      • ✅Product Comparison
      • â˜‘ī¸Portfolio Scoring
    • ✨Customization
      • âš™ī¸What can you customize?
        • 📏Product characteristics
        • 🔄Reuse settings
        • 💠Component definitions
        • 🚚Manufacturing & Transportation
        • 💚Sourcing settings
        • â™ģī¸Recoverability settings
        • âš—ī¸Chemicals of Concern
        • đŸĨ—Food or beverage content
      • 👩‍đŸĢHow to customize?
        • đŸĨĄCreate a new product
        • 🔧Edit an existing product
        • 🍛Define a custom food
        • â™ģī¸Adjusting recovery settings
    • 🍜Use case example
  • Leveraging Results
    • 🧠How to apply the results of the tool?
  • Misc
    • 🔒Account & personal data
    • 📖Glossary
    • ❓Frequently asked questions
    • 👋About SUM'D
Powered by GitBook
LogoLogo

Follow us!

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Learn more

  • Website
  • Newsletter
  • Blog

Contact us

  • Email
  • Feedback form
  • FAQ

Legal links

  • Terms and conditions
  • Imprint and disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookie policy

The UP Scorecard is a free, easy-to-use web-based tool to assess the impacts of foodware and food packaging on human and environmental health.

On this page
Export as PDF
  1. METHODOLOGY
  2. The six UP Scorecard metrics

Climate Impact

PreviousThe six UP Scorecard metricsNextWater Use

Last updated 1 month ago

"Climate Change is the defining issue of our time and we are at a defining moment. From shifting weather patterns that threaten food production, to rising sea levels that increase the risk of catastrophic flooding, the impacts of climate change are global in scope and unprecedented in scale. Without drastic action today, adapting to these impacts in the future will be more difficult and costly." - United Nations, on climate change as a global issue.

Because the current and future impacts of climate change are catastrophic, this phenomenon is logically a focus for sustainability reporting, and the UP Scorecard includes a Climate metric: a quantitative estimate of the life cycle global warming impact of the product.

Overview

Climate change is driven by greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions like carbon dioxide (CO₂), methane (CH₄), and nitrous oxide (N₂O). LCA helps track these emissions, from the extraction of raw materials to production, use, and disposal. These processes include raw material production, container manufacturing, delivery to a food service facility, use, washing (for reusable products), waste collection, landfilling, incineration, sorting, reclamation, and recycling. This provides a clear picture of a product’s contribution to climate change and enables efforts to reduce carbon footprints.


Packaging material

The choice of packaging material is important. Materials with the highest Global Warming Potential (GWP) are generally those that require significant amounts of energy during extraction, processing, and manufacturing, and those that rely on fossil fuels for production. Some materials with particularly high GWP are metals, plastics, and glass.


Packaging system

The choice of packaging system also affects the climate impact of food packaging solutions. For single-use packaging, most greenhouse gas emissions are associated with the production phase, and the ability of recycling at end-of-life to prevent the use of virgin materials. The greenhouse gas emissions associated with a reusable product are highly correlated to the energy and resource intensity required for production and cleaning, its weight in combination with the mode and distance it is transported, and the ability of recycling at end-of-life to prevent the use of virgin materials. Unlike single-use products, reusables require additional transport and washing cycles that should be considered to minimize climate impacts.

Indicator: g CO2 equivalents (CO2e)


Example scores

The graphic below shows the climate impact calculated in the tool for disposable plates and trays made of different materials, and a reusable plate.

The Climate indicator estimates the mass of carbon dioxide equivalent emissions of the product and is assessed using the IPCC 2013 radiative forcing factors as implemented by the Ecoinvent Centre. The implementation includes 45 substances characterized in terms of their relative radiative forcing potential in comparison to CO2. More details are provided in the detailed methodology under and .

The tool shows the absolute value for GHG emissions in and a normalized score from 0 to 100 (100 being the best score):

📊
â˜ī¸
Life Cycle Model
Climate Change & Blue Water Use
grams of CO2 equivalents
Cover

Life Cycle Model

Cover

Introduction to the ecoinvent database

Cover

Methodology: Climate Impact

The climate metric measures the entire greenhouse gas footprint of a product's whole life cycle.
Indicator () and normalized score (from 0 being the worst to 100 being the best)
Example estimations of grams of used per of different plates and trays.
g CO2 equivalent
CO2 equivalents (g CO2-eq)
functional unit